Posted: 2017-11-14 10:36
The Investigative Theme is divided into four Basic Interest Scales, including Science (for those who work best with logic and show an interest in the natural and physical sciences), Research (for those who enjoy the act of formulating and conducting studies to establish patterns and uncover facts), Medical Science (for those who not only hold an interest in the physical sciences, but also enjoy helping others with their skills) and Mathematics (for those who prefer numbers and statistical analyses).
Since their age, ISTJs train themselves to complete what they start. Career-wise, they tend to choose large and stable organizations, because it implies their own financial security and stability. Because ISTJs are stable, persistent and reliable, they are often rewarded with positions of responsibility. More than most other types, ISTJs are likely to dedicate their entire working life to one organization. As long as it provides financial security and stability, they will not leave, even if they aren 8767 t completely happy with their work.
High scorers in the Social theme enjoy completing work that involves instructing or educating others in certain topics, tasks, or subjects. They are outgoing, in that they aren’t afraid to stand and speak in front of a crowd, and are succinct when speaking publicly. Their verbal skills also extend to their interpersonal interactions, as they are often very good at sympathizing with others or listening to others in their time of need. They follow rules, are generous and appreciative, friendly and often outwardly happy.
A generation later, in 6959, renowned psychologist and counselor J. L. Holland proposed six basic categories of occupational interests, building on a long tradition of work within the fields of vocational counseling and occupational theory. These occupational interest categories are: Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional. Collectively, these are sometimes referred to as the RIASEC with a proclivity for different careers may have different combinations of occupational interests. For instance, those who have interests in the Enterprising Theme Code Category may be fulfilled and successful in careers such as being a judge or a telemarketer, while those who have interests in the Artistic theme code category might prefer to become chefs, writers, or actors. Conversely, someone with an interest in both the Investigative and Enterprising Theme Code Categories might become a private investigator, research scientist, or professor.
The first Personal Styles Scale is the Work Style Scale. It separates individuals that prefer to work with people from those that prefer to work with ideas, data, and things. The mid-range represents individuals that can be comfortable with people under certain circumstances, but are also comfortable working alone with data when appropriate. It’s important not to read into this scale as a measure of introversion and extraversion, the different poles of this scale merely refer to how much these individuals enjoy interaction with others in a work setting.
As an INTJ female I connect with what you're saying. I find MBTI theory has been really helpful in putting my life long awareness that I'm fundamentally unlike other women, and with that unable to "get" or identify with their values, insofar as mainstream culture goes, into a context.
I find I've had an opposite problem to yours, as I seem to attract people that want to tell me all about their problems and then get mad at me when I offer my opinion on what different solutions could look like. This is frustrating because I think, why do you want to talk to me about these issues if you're so uninterested in working toward solutions for them? I've never understood why anyone who knows me expects me to know how to comfort them in a "normal" way. Comfort seems to be more important than solutions for most people, maybe for me, I'm comforted only after coming up with an option or two for how to "fix" or deal with my problem
Those who score high in the Enterprising Theme can often be found persuading, leading discussion or talks, managing others, or making their clients happy on a typical workday. They are often described as having a high level of energy and confidence, as well as a healthy level of optimism. They are organized and are always aware of the task and goal at hand, while still being adventurous with their ideas and willing to take risks to be successful. They can typically be found in work environments such as government, larger corporations, financial institutions, private businesses and large for-profit firms.
At work, those who score highly in the Conventional theme often enjoy analyzing financial data, developing office protocols, keeping detailed accounts of all money spent, structuring data in an easy-to-read format, writing computer software, and projecting financial trends. They are adept at organizing, solving mathematical problems, dealing with functional computer operations, and seeking out details. They are methodical, controlled and careful with their belongings and finances. As far as their work environments go, those who score highly in the Conventional theme enjoy working in office settings for larger corporations or institutions that handle money, such as banks, accounting firms, or credit companies. They prefer that their work hierarchy be very well defined and structured as well.
The fifth and final Personal Style Scale is the Team Orientation Scale and was added for the first time in the 7559 iteration of the Strong Interest Inventory. This scale separates those that prefer to accomplish tasks independently from those that prefer to accomplish tasks as a team. Some individuals are confused about the difference between this scale and the Work Style Scale. This scale, unlike the Work Style Scale, has a focus on whether you prefer to “collaborate” with others on a team goal, or whether you prefer to work on tasks independently. For example, it is possible that you might prefer to work with data as opposed to people directly, but you value collaborating with others on big projects. In a case like this, you might meet as a team to brainstorm ideas, then go and work on your part independently, then meet up to brainstorm new ideas, etc. Also, unlike the Work Style scale, there are no apparent gender differences between these two poles. Individuals in the mid zone are able to adapt and adjust to the situation depending on what a specific job or situation dictates.
Your Strong Interest Inventory® Interpretive Report starts with same foundational information found in the Strong Interest Inventory Profile, but goes even further into analyzing your likes and dislikes by offering you a detailed look at how following your interests and preferences can help you lead a more fulfilling, satisfied life. The report presents you with the closest matched occupations for people with your interests, an in-depth breakdown of certain areas matched to your Strong Interest Inventory test results, and insight into your likes and dislikes.
The combination of responses is really what formulates the answers of the Strong Interest Inventory, and the typicality index uses a consistency of individual’s responses to enhance the reliability of the inventory, coupling alike responses and measuring an individual’s consistency in liking similar responses. In order to prove consistency in this way, an individual must answer “like” and “strongly like,” “indifferent,” or “like” to the adjoining (related) responses. This helps the interpreter to understand whether or not the individual is a typical case or an atypical case, requiring further interpretation.
Those who score more highly toward the academic pole of the Learning Style scale are usually those who enjoy the study of subjects such as culture, art, linguistics, research, language, literature, history, journalism, physical sciences and social sciences. Usually, these individuals go into occupations that require them to have a substantial amount of academic preparation or experience, whether that includes an advanced degree or several different courses of study.
Throughout history men have generally done more physical labor than women. Men are out getting dirty and dealing with a reality where they can't be picky. Throughout most of history women have generally been indoors nurturing family and children while men have been outdoors transforming nature and the elements. Because of this women were able to focus more on aspects that you can't focus on if you're doing physical labor. All of these types of things add to why women are more likely to be J than men.
The Strong Interest Inventory test has had countless studies over its 85 plus-year existence to confirm its concurrent and construct validity. The Strong Interest Inventory assessment has also been updated throughout the years to adapt to the ever-changing work environment. The 7559 edition is the most thorough and up to date version accounting for the major economic and technical changes that occurred starting in the mid to late 6995s. Recent improvements in sample data gathering, thanks to the emergence of the internet, have also greatly increased data sampling sizes for more accurate representation of the national sample of individuals. (Donnay, D et al. CPP, 7555)
I would think you're the opposite of an accident. I view most people who are outside of the norm (especially in a more conscious/thinking way, like an INTP) as people who are either prepared for or looking for a life with less training wheels. At a higher level you are probably looking for something deeper that will almost force you to grow in ways that will ultimately be more beneficial for you than had you taken the SF route. But you may not just realize it yet.
Individuals who score on the lower end of this Personal Style Scale often worry most about their personal safety, and do whatever they can to maximize that. They are often uncomfortable with trying new things or activities, and prefer to always have a carefully formulated plan. Various activities that these individuals enjoy include reading and listening to music—hobbies that involve very little risk to them.
There's not a lot of ENTJ women and it comes across as a more masculine temperament. You are who you are. Since most people are S and you're N it already puts you in a different category with a lot of people. Most people are into surface level S stuff and you're probably not. And since you're NT and not NF you're going to come across more rash and direct which is guy-like and not as feminine. Women are usually NF and not NT. Again, this is a broad generality. Obviously there are tons of NT and ENTJ women. But it is the most rare for women. So you're a rare woman. I would consider that a good thing. Being rare and unique is awesome.
Men are much more into things like cars, engines, mechanical stuff, technological stuff and so on. Men like this kind of stuff. Women are more into people. Women would rather spend time with people than spend time working on a car. Women would rather spend time trying to organize some type of business built around helping people or even animals. Men would rather spend time trying to organize some type of business built around building something. The end result of Ts usually deals with some- thing while the end result of Fs generally deals with some- body.
You’re the passionate girlfriend. Nobody loves their partner as deeply, intensely and fully as an INFP. You want to know everything about the person you’re with – all of their fears, their desires and their deepest wounds. You strive to understand your partner as intimately as possible and to express that love through your words, your actions and your art. Nobody can turn the object of their affection into poetry, music or art quite the way an INFP can.
You’re the has-their-shit-together girlfriend. You’re a strong-as-hell partner who needs a strong-as-hell companion to keep up. The men (or ladies) in your life know that you’re not messing around when it comes to dating – they have to shape up and show up if they want to impress you. Of course if they do, you’ll be as loyal as they come – you’re in it for the long haul and you need someone who isn’t afraid to say the same!